Friday, June 27, 2008
Thursday, June 26, 2008
Governor Charlie Crist approves deal, acquires 187,000 acres for the Everglades
From The Palm Beach Post:
BY Staff writers Dianna Smith and Jennifer Sorentrue
WST PALM BEACH, Fla. — Florida Gov. Charlie Crist and other state leaders signed off Tuesday on the outlines of a $1.75 billion deal that will give United States Sugar Corp. six years to end its operations while handing taxpayers control over 187,000 acres in the historic northern Everglades.
Crist called the purchase "as monumental as our nation's first national park" — Yellowstone, created by then-President Ulysses Grant.
Besides helping restore the Everglades, environmentalists hope, the purchase also would allow the state to end the harmful dumping of noxious Lake Okeechobee water into the St. Lucie and Caloosahatchee rivers. Instead, the water could flow through marshes that would cleanse it and return it to the Everglades. Read more...
UPDATE: Blockbuster land deal faces many obstacles
See a slideshow here.
BY Staff writers Dianna Smith and Jennifer Sorentrue
WST PALM BEACH, Fla. — Florida Gov. Charlie Crist and other state leaders signed off Tuesday on the outlines of a $1.75 billion deal that will give United States Sugar Corp. six years to end its operations while handing taxpayers control over 187,000 acres in the historic northern Everglades.
Crist called the purchase "as monumental as our nation's first national park" — Yellowstone, created by then-President Ulysses Grant.
Besides helping restore the Everglades, environmentalists hope, the purchase also would allow the state to end the harmful dumping of noxious Lake Okeechobee water into the St. Lucie and Caloosahatchee rivers. Instead, the water could flow through marshes that would cleanse it and return it to the Everglades. Read more...
UPDATE: Blockbuster land deal faces many obstacles
See a slideshow here.
Wednesday, June 18, 2008
Get ready to Dump the Pump!
Tomorrow is National Dump the Pump Day!
People are encouraged to leave their their cars at home and instead, discover the benefits of public transportation. As the slogan of this holiday states, SAVE THE MONEY, SAVE THE PLANET.
So why not take the bus or ride the train (in Florida- the Tri-Rail) ? You'll just have to sit back and relax while the bus or train safely takes you to your destination. You won't have to worry about wasting gas or polluting the environment.
Now that's what I call a great idea!
Need more reasons to dump the pump?
UPDATE: June 20, 2008
Below: As an incentive to get riders on public transportation, Tri-Rail joined with other agencies to celebrate "Dump The Pump Day" in Palm Beach County Thursday, June 19, 2008.
Photo and caption by Palm Beach Post photographer Chris Matula.
People are encouraged to leave their their cars at home and instead, discover the benefits of public transportation. As the slogan of this holiday states, SAVE THE MONEY, SAVE THE PLANET.
So why not take the bus or ride the train (in Florida- the Tri-Rail) ? You'll just have to sit back and relax while the bus or train safely takes you to your destination. You won't have to worry about wasting gas or polluting the environment.
Now that's what I call a great idea!
Need more reasons to dump the pump?
UPDATE: June 20, 2008
Below: As an incentive to get riders on public transportation, Tri-Rail joined with other agencies to celebrate "Dump The Pump Day" in Palm Beach County Thursday, June 19, 2008.
Photo and caption by Palm Beach Post photographer Chris Matula.
Labels:
Dump the Pump,
environment,
gasoline,
polluting,
Tri-Rail
Saturday, June 14, 2008
Study: Guys with "green" cars get all the babes
The results of recent study by the U.S. Department of Energy and General Motors are in: girls dig guys who drive ecologically-conscious cars.
Among the findings (as published on Yahoo.com):
-Nearly 9 in 10 women (88 percent) say they'd rather chat up someone who owns the latest fuel-efficient car versus the latest sports car.
-Eighty percent of American car buyers would find someone with the latest fuel-efficient car more interesting to talk to at a party than someone with the latest sports car.
-More than 4 out of 10 (45 percent) 18- to 43-year-olds say it's a fashion faux pas nowadays to have a car that's not green or environmentally friendly. (Of course, this doesn't mean that a man has run out and buy a hybrid right away. I mean if he can, great. But just as long as he drives a car that isn't a major offense against the environment and he makes the effort not to drive as much, or plan his trips accordingly, that's just as good.)
Recently a guy who drives a Hummer asked me out. I was coming out of the bank and there he was, standing in front of his H3, thinking he's all that, trying to make conversation. At some point, I asked him if he was aware of how much gas it wastes and how bad it is for the environment and he replied- "Well, it doesn't bother me. I can afford it, you know?" What a jerk! I wasn't interested anyway, but it's just perplexing how ignorant people are in regards of being kind to our planet.
Anyway, back to the study-it was part of a competition in which engineering students had to build vehicles utilizing innovative automotive technologies that would minimize the environmental impact of personal transportation and "illustrate pathways to a sustainable transportation future."
Personally, I totally agree with the study. To me, a man who's actually eco-conscious is incredibly attractive. (Other things taken into account as well, of course.)
I've never really cared about what kind of car a man drives. I had always thought that was superficial and irrelevant. But now things have changed. In these times when we really have to be aware of what kind of impact our actions have on our planet, I must say that I now do pay attention to things like that, not because I care how much money a guy makes or his "status," but because I care how much HE cares about the environment.
Now that's HOT!
Sunday, June 8, 2008
French "Spiderman" climbs NYT building, draws attention to global warming
This week, Alain Robert, dubbed the "French Spiderman," scaled the walls of the New York Times building in Times Square, New York.
In a press release he said the stunt, which he performed Tuesday, June 5, was "a peaceful way to create support for far greater and urgent action from world leaders on global warming."
While climbing, he hung a large, yellow banner with a message about the urgency in taking greater action against global warming.
He was later arrested and charged in a Manhattan court Friday, but released on parole, court officilas said.
Still, his action was nothing short of admirable and ingenious (but kids, don't try this at home!). His stunt, and the message behind it, definitely drew the attention of not only New Yorkers, but people around the country and around the world.
Bravo, monsieur!
Saturday, June 7, 2008
Climate Change Bill dies in the Senate
The Senate today brought the Climate Change Bill to an end, at least for this year, as it did not get the votes it needed to proceed.
The Senate begun debating the bill Monday. Democrats moved to end debate and move to a final vote, which required 60 votes to pass, but failed, with 48 in favor and 36 against. Take a look at how your state Senator voted here.
The bill would have required major reductions in greenhouse gases. Specifically, it would have required U.S. emissions of greenhouse gases to peak in 2012, then gradually decline by about 2 percent a year until 2050 - for a total reduction of about 66 percent from current levels.
For more details about the bill, read this posting from The San Francisco Chronicle.
Bill supporters drew attention to the gravity of the climate change crisis. Although absent, presidential candidate Barack Obama, said in a statement that "The future of our planet is at stake." Meanwhile, Senate majority leader Harry Reid called climate change "the most important issue facing the world today."
Democrats blamed the Republicans for the impasse. Carl Pope, executive director of the Sierra Club, issued this statement:
The Senate begun debating the bill Monday. Democrats moved to end debate and move to a final vote, which required 60 votes to pass, but failed, with 48 in favor and 36 against. Take a look at how your state Senator voted here.
The bill would have required major reductions in greenhouse gases. Specifically, it would have required U.S. emissions of greenhouse gases to peak in 2012, then gradually decline by about 2 percent a year until 2050 - for a total reduction of about 66 percent from current levels.
For more details about the bill, read this posting from The San Francisco Chronicle.
Bill supporters drew attention to the gravity of the climate change crisis. Although absent, presidential candidate Barack Obama, said in a statement that "The future of our planet is at stake." Meanwhile, Senate majority leader Harry Reid called climate change "the most important issue facing the world today."
Democrats blamed the Republicans for the impasse. Carl Pope, executive director of the Sierra Club, issued this statement:
A reckless and cynical minority has denied the Senate—and the American
people—the meaningful and long overdo debate on global warming their
constituents have been clamoring for. While the Senate leadership and a
bi-partisan group of Senators sought to debate the solutions to our
ever-deepening environmental and economic crises, the Republican leadership
instead used theatrics to tie the Senate in knots for the sole purpose of
"making political points."Even if the bill had pushed through the Senate, President Bush had threatened to veto the legislation. The bill may have a better chance next year with a new president who will hopefully understand the importance of doing something on a legislative level about the climate change crisis.
Labels:
Carl Pope,
global warming,
GOP,
Senate,
Sierra Club
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)